66% of 2013 ERP Implementations Are Only Receiving 50% or Less Promised Benefits !

In a recent survey of ERP implementations conducted by the Panorama Consulting Group, it was discovered that over 66% of those ERP implementations say that they are receiving 50% or less of the promised benefits. Additionally, the study revealed that it did not matter who the ERP vendor was, Oracle, SAP or Microsoft Dynamics. This revelation should come of no surprise to seasoned ERP professionals.

Many times the companies hire as a "General Software Contractor" the very same value added reseller who marketed and sold them the ERP solution. As companies and users become more sophisticated in their requirements, it has become unreasonable, not to mention expensive, for any one single entity to successfully implement all the various modules that exist in advanced ERP software let alone begin "enhancements" into areas that they have no deep domain expertise in. As a result, you have over commitment, under performance and customer dissatisfaction.

To be certain, the customers themselves are to be held accountable for some of their own disappointment. All too often we have seen that new software implementations are used as a club to facilitate "process re-engineering" in companies without fully understanding the organizational impact. Furthermore, user departments and communities have become subservient to misguided IT policies direction at the expense of the organization.

As it becomes increasingly difficult and expensive to implement "enterprise" ERP software, companies need to focus on removing "silos" in their decision process and making Benefits Realization an essential part of the overall initial implementation process and not as an after thought to be completed in Phase 3 or 4 ....


The Complexity of Supply Chain Management

Shields Bag and Printing, Yakima WA Selects Dynamics TMS

We are pleased to welcome Shields Bag and Printing Company, Yakima WA as our newest Dynamics TMS customer. Shields will be implementing our newest release which includes our web based tariff management and rate quote portal.

NGL @ Supply Chain and Transportation Expo USA March 17-20

Join us at the Supply Chain and Transportation Expo USA on March 17-20, 2014 in Atlanta, GA Booth #3016 to see our newest release v-7.0 of FreightMaster and Dynamics TMS. The new release has HTML5 web based multi mode tariff management that supports private and public tariff/contracts, rate shopping, multi level optimization, dynamic route guide logic, enhanced ETA calculations, motor carrier and rail TransLoad/X-dock logic, freight/service costing and accruals by leg, CLM rail car location messaging, rail leg weight restrictions by railroad, over-lead time alerting, embedded multi mode EDI with PC Miler.

New Multi Mode Tariff Management Module Added To Transportation Collaboration Portal

A new multi mode, multi temp, multi currency Tariff Management Module has been added to version 6.3.0 of our HTML5 NEXTrack Internet Collaboration Portal. See it in action at the upcoming Dynamics ERP User Meeting in Tampa Oct 21-25 booth #223  ..........Tomorrow's TMS Functionality Is Available Today !

HTML5 Based Transportation Portal for Microsoft Dynamics ERP

Hello All ! Our new HTML5 based transportation collaboration portal is being rolled out this quarter to existing and new TMS customers as part of the new TMS version 7.0 release.

The fully HTML5 compliant portal allows internal and external users, vendors and customers

• Internet based multi mode multi temp transportation rate shopping
• Self service tariff management
• Transport provider
• Tariff management: multi mode, multi temp, multi Currency
• order tender
• acknowledgement
• branded track and trace
• load settlement
• drag and drop appointment scheduling of inbound, outbound and transfer orders.

For more information contact Mr. John Riske at 847-963-0007 x136
or visit http://www.DynamicsTMS.com

Convergence AX 2012 Warehouse & Transportation Announcement a Great Start But Functionality Still Falls Short

At the annual Dynamics Conference in New Orleans, Microsoft announced that new releases of AX 2012 will have new "base" warehouse and transportation functionality available. This is wonderful news and a step in the right direction, but it's a stop gap measure at best. If MS really wants to compete with SAP and Oracle in the global supply chain arena, they need to step up their offerings with Tier I solutions and Partners that have deep domain expertise and solutions that allow users to implement and manage strategies on a global supply chain basis. Until that happens, the competition will still have a leg up.

Inbound Freight Opportunities - Still There!

32 years after the enactment of the Motor Carrier Act of 1980, many organizations are still not taking advantage of the transportation savings and bottom line opportunities that can be theirs for the taking. There are many reasons for this phenomenon, but the prevailing one is that many companies still do not understand how to go about creating, executing and monitoring an inbound freight project. Here’s a quick primer I have found useful.

Create a project team. Call on the expertise of your procurement and logistics representatives, and draw on each department's need for specific cost information to better manage the process. An IT member or advisor may also be a valuable addition.

Define the project goals. Decide what you expect to accomplish when this project is completed. Is it to simply reduce costs, improve vendor relations, gain better inventory control, create vendor managed inventory, attain control over inbound orders, or better utilize a dedicated fleet?

Determine key performance indicators (KPI). Create a baseline or benchmark of current performance, and determine KPI, which might include supplier performance (order acknowledge, order fill rate, ship on time), carrier performance (accept shipment tender, on-time pick-up, on-time delivery), exception summary reporting, and customer and supplier satisfaction metrics.

Classify and quantify current inbound operations. Evaluate your current inbound shipments and classify by who controls the freight (prepaid or collect), where the freight costs lie, and whether the carrier is selected via a routing guide.

Consider investing in TMS technology. Transportation management solutions and business-to-business connectivity can provide both a systematic approach to your inbound processes and financial controls. http://www.FreightMasterTMS.com

Evaluate best landed cost by supplier. To calculate best landed cost, you must be able to allocate freight charges plus fuel surcharges plus assessorial fees to get the true picture of your costs. Select a software tool to help you rate and re-rate shipments based on all available scenarios. Ask these questions: Does your organization really want to take on the freight? If a supplier is larger than you, it may have better freight rates, but what is being invoiced in the cost of goods? This is where the visibility to freight costs segregated from the costs of goods gives an organization the opportunity to control expenses.

Survey supplier technology capabilities. Make sure they have EDI capabilities, and a supplier portal with a web form to provide "ready to ship" information. Don't underestimate the amount of work required to "cleanse" the data from suppliers.

Prioritize suppliers for quick results. In any project, delivering quick wins or payback should be a goal. Prioritize your suppliers by ease of implementation and largest payback. Typically these are non-compliant collect suppliers or new suppliers where you can influence the freight terms.

Execute. Communicate the plan in advance to all involved parties, both internally and externally, to get their buy-in to the process. Then implement the targeted changes.

Measure/monitor compliance and performance. Share with your suppliers how their performance will be measured. Establish routing compliance reviews with each supplier and ensure data is available for analysis by both parties at any time.